PoR: Difference between revisions
From Chainlink Community Wiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
</td></tr></table> | </td></tr></table> | ||
}} | }} | ||
---- | |||
Chainlink Proof of Reserve is a decentralized reserve verification solution that provides users with on-chain proof regarding the collateralization of off-chain assets.<ref>https://backed.fi/news-updates/backed-chainlink-proof-of-reserve</ref> | |||
---- | |||
Chainlink Proof of Reserve (PoR) is an automated solution that helps protocols achieve a high standard of transparency and verifiability by providing real-time information about collateralization in a secure and decentralized manner. Specifically, it enables developers and users to verify that stablecoins, wrapped tokens, and other assets utilizing off-chain or cross-chain reserves are fully backed by collateral. | |||
By using Chainlink PoR, wrapped token products can add an extra layer of security to their minting mechanism to help control supply and prevent under collateralization, helping ensure that the circulating supply reflects the off-chain or cross-chain supply in reserve. | |||
<ref>https://blog.chain.link/verify-bitcoin-collateral-with-chainlink-proof-of-reserve/</ref> | |||
---- | |||
PoR reference feeds provide smart contracts with the data needed to calculate the true collateralization of any on-chain asset backed by off-chain reserves. | |||
<ref>https://blog.chain.link/stablecoins-and-proof-of-reserve/</ref>--[[User:Reggie|Reggie]] ([[User talk:Reggie|talk]]) 05:33, 4 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Bottom Line: At the end of the day, this is a very simple concept, that custodians need to be able to prove that they are indeed holding the assets that their clients have entrusted to their care. This is called Proof of Reserves (PoR). --[[User:Reggie|Reggie]] ([[User talk:Reggie|talk]]) 07:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)<ref name="CODC" /> | Bottom Line: At the end of the day, this is a very simple concept, that custodians need to be able to prove that they are indeed holding the assets that their clients have entrusted to their care. This is called Proof of Reserves (PoR). --[[User:Reggie|Reggie]] ([[User talk:Reggie|talk]]) 07:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)<ref name="CODC">https://digitalchamber.org/proof-of-reserves-blog/</ref> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Background: As the digital assets industry has developed, both consumers and institutional investors have relied on large custodians, exchanges, and other intermediaries to custody their assets. These intermediaries are entrusted with maintaining adequate digital asset reserves to meet customer liabilities (those digital assets the exchange or custodian holds for its customers). --[[User:Reggie|Reggie]] ([[User talk:Reggie|talk]]) 07:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)<ref name="CODC" | Background: As the digital assets industry has developed, both consumers and institutional investors have relied on large custodians, exchanges, and other intermediaries to custody their assets. These intermediaries are entrusted with maintaining adequate digital asset reserves to meet customer liabilities (those digital assets the exchange or custodian holds for its customers). --[[User:Reggie|Reggie]] ([[User talk:Reggie|talk]]) 07:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)<ref name="CODC" /> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
The Problem: The growth of the industry has resulted in uneven and inconsistent methods for proving the existence of reserves to meet customer liabilities. Investors and customers need assurance that their funds are properly managed. Digital assets by their very nature offer built-in transparency but, until now, the innate cryptographic auditability of these assets has been woefully underutilized, despite the low technical barriers to doing so.--[[User:Reggie|Reggie]] ([[User talk:Reggie|talk]]) 07:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)<ref name="CODC" /> | The Problem: The growth of the industry has resulted in uneven and inconsistent methods for proving the existence of reserves to meet customer liabilities. Investors and customers need assurance that their funds are properly managed. Digital assets by their very nature offer built-in transparency but, until now, the innate cryptographic auditability of these assets has been woefully underutilized, despite the low technical barriers to doing so.--[[User:Reggie|Reggie]] ([[User talk:Reggie|talk]]) 07:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)<ref name="CODC" /> | ||
Latest revision as of 07:56, 17 December 2022
PoR Discussion Page
 |
Welcome to the talk page for discussing improvements to the PoR article. Talk pages (also known as discussion pages) are Wiki administration pages where editors/contributors discuss improvements that can be made to an article. NOTE: Discussion pages are not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. When you post a message on a talk page, you should always sign and date your comment so that other editors can follow the thread of the conversation. To do this, either type four tildes (~) at the end of your comment or just click the signature button on the row of buttons above the edit box. |
Chainlink Proof of Reserve is a decentralized reserve verification solution that provides users with on-chain proof regarding the collateralization of off-chain assets.[1]
Chainlink Proof of Reserve (PoR) is an automated solution that helps protocols achieve a high standard of transparency and verifiability by providing real-time information about collateralization in a secure and decentralized manner. Specifically, it enables developers and users to verify that stablecoins, wrapped tokens, and other assets utilizing off-chain or cross-chain reserves are fully backed by collateral.
By using Chainlink PoR, wrapped token products can add an extra layer of security to their minting mechanism to help control supply and prevent under collateralization, helping ensure that the circulating supply reflects the off-chain or cross-chain supply in reserve.
PoR reference feeds provide smart contracts with the data needed to calculate the true collateralization of any on-chain asset backed by off-chain reserves. [3]--Reggie (talk) 05:33, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Bottom Line: At the end of the day, this is a very simple concept, that custodians need to be able to prove that they are indeed holding the assets that their clients have entrusted to their care. This is called Proof of Reserves (PoR). --Reggie (talk) 07:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[4]
Background: As the digital assets industry has developed, both consumers and institutional investors have relied on large custodians, exchanges, and other intermediaries to custody their assets. These intermediaries are entrusted with maintaining adequate digital asset reserves to meet customer liabilities (those digital assets the exchange or custodian holds for its customers). --Reggie (talk) 07:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[4]
The Problem: The growth of the industry has resulted in uneven and inconsistent methods for proving the existence of reserves to meet customer liabilities. Investors and customers need assurance that their funds are properly managed. Digital assets by their very nature offer built-in transparency but, until now, the innate cryptographic auditability of these assets has been woefully underutilized, despite the low technical barriers to doing so.--Reggie (talk) 07:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[4]
With PoR, the cryptocurrency holdings of a company can be easily audited through an automated process that leverages the transparency of blockchains, smart contracts and oracles.
This real-time auditing of collateral helps to ensure that user funds are protected from “unforeseen fractional reserve practices and other fraudulent activity from off-chain custodians.” In doing so, PoR helps to bring a higher degree of transparency to the crypto ecosystem as a whole and it addresses some of the biggest complaints about how the current financial system operates. --Reggie (talk) 08:52, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
https://chain.link/case-studies/celsius - Good quotes in this article. "As users and developers adopt more blockchains and layer-2 networks, liquidity becomes siloed across the ecosystem. Unlocking this fragmented liquidity through wrapped tokens and creating more interoperability is a critical challenge for the ecosystem to solve. Without a solution to this issue, the benefits of permissionless composability are reduced and developers need to start from scratch every time a new ecosystem is bootstrapped.
But how can projects make sure that wrapped tokens remain sufficiently collateralized when connectivity between different blockchains is inherently limited? While ensuring that wrapped tokens are collateralized at all times is critical for a robust cross-chain ecosystem, using centralized intermediaries and manual audits introduces efficiency bottlenecks and centralization risks.
An automated process is required that helps secure the minting and redemption of wrapped tokens and enables Celsius to securely, transparently, and reliably audit reserves so that users can move assets between blockchains and provide cross-chain liquidity." --Reggie (talk) 08:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)